Here's what I'm getting from the #ZuckerBowl hearings:
The folks in the Senate and House have a strange push for their particular agendas.
No one understands tech or how ads work.
Everyone is missing the point of the public's fears.
Sadly, this falls right in line with the idea of how to regulate the internet and to reduce the Net Neutrality as a whole. Their agenda being, we need to regulate how internet companies function, sociologically, which is the exact WRONG direction to go.
-
-
With toolbags such as
@tedcruz pulling their talking points cards on the table, they sadly miss the point; which of course is the privacy of citizens. Keep in mind, these are the same folks who used CA to bolster their political campaigns.Pokaż ten wątek -
I fear the goal of these hearings (outside of trying to understand how the interwebs work in the first place), is to pressure Facebook to fit into some political arena and to sponsor bills that will eventually be filled with pork barrel spending and other hidden nonsense.
Pokaż ten wątek -
If you want to get to the meat of the situation, Washington, you'll need to ask how did CA get this information. Did FB know about this problem before? And if they've resolved it since and how? THEN you can talk about legislation and how to best keep your citizens safe.
Pokaż ten wątek -
Of course, this is the same lot that thinks it's okay to spy on American cits through their computers and phones, so the irony here is palpable. At least in FB's defense, they warn you that your information is being collected. Not so with the American gov and other tech companies
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.