Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
But instead, what he tends to do is bark back at the committee for bringing it up. If you've ever been caught for doing something you probably shouldn't have, you should know first-hand that one of the go-to reactions is to bite back at the person questioning you.
Mom: "Did you take cookies from the cookie jar?" Child: "[Insert sibling's name here] once took cookies from the cookie jar and THEY never got caught." M: "I'm not asking them, I'm asking you." C: "But you should. Have YOU ever taken cookies out of the cookie jar?"
All I'm saying is that an innocent person would not throw it back at another's face on whether they did the thing they're being asked. They would simply state yes or no. I assume Kavanaugh is worried that if he told the truth, it'd be used against him later.
Which is somewhat fair, but an incorrect assessment. Rep: "Have you ever passed out from drinking too much?" BK: "Much like many of us have here, I have probably had one too many drinks which could have given me a lapse of time, yes." ^ Probably would've been better than "No."
Tip-toeing around common elements of human nature is not what's on trial here. What's on trial is whether or not you had the instinct or maliciousness in behavior to grind on a young woman while intoxicated. What we're trying to establish here is your relationship w/ alcohol.
This is why it's hard to take Brett Kavanaugh's testimony seriously, because he refuses to take the questions seriously. He may not want to implicate himself, sure, but what he IS doing, is giving cause for concern for his ability to tell the truth. Which is why it rings untrue.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
