Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
jamesheathers's profile
🏴James Heathers🏴
🏴James Heathers🏴
 🏴James Heathers 🏴
@jamesheathers

Tweets

 🏴James Heathers 🏴

@jamesheathers

Postdoc. Human scum. Allegedly swashbuckling. Likes: scallywag behaviour, signal analysis, beer, deadlifts, yelling, cats (wobbly). Cohost of @hertzpodcast.

The warm embrace of Uncle Sam
jamesheathers.com
Joined September 2011

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1.  🏴James Heathers 🏴‏ @jamesheathers 27 Oct 2018

       🏴James Heathers 🏴 Retweeted Julia Galef

      Nothing, NOTHING, in research raises my blood pressure like the "teach the controversy" approach to theory and citations.https://twitter.com/juliagalef/status/1045039424038350848 …

       🏴James Heathers 🏴 added,

      Julia GalefVerified account @juliagalef
      The more I follow academic debates, the more I think over-politeness harms our ability to converge on the truth. A lot of papers are weak enough they constitute ~zero evidence for their claim. But critics just politely refer to "questions" or "debate" around the papers... 1/n
      Show this thread
      1 reply 5 retweets 17 likes
      Show this thread
       🏴James Heathers 🏴‏ @jamesheathers 27 Oct 2018

      Researcher A: here is my theory *becomes famous* Researcher B: theory A is totally utterly incandescently dog-botheringly wrong *demonstrates using facts and whatnot* Researcher C: "some controversy exists over theory A **cite cite** but I shall now treat it as the word of God."

      5:39 AM - 27 Oct 2018
      • 11 Retweets
      • 46 Likes
      • Andrew Althouse Kaisa Saurio Sinéad Conneely Cretino Nyadnar#17 Saloni 💘 Dr Suzy J Styles jonas Mine Misirlisoy
      5 replies 11 retweets 46 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Sean Mackinnon‏ @seanpmackinnon 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @jamesheathers

          Yeah, it's very annoying. Usually though, it's because Reviewer 1 is like, "cite my research" and I have to compromise to get published, tbh.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3.  🏴James Heathers 🏴‏ @jamesheathers 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @seanpmackinnon

          It's often very disadvantageous for the life of your paper to go to the mattresses. Even with facts.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Adam Pegler‏ @pegleraj 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @jamesheathers

          Some similarity with the macroeconomic concept of banks that are ‘Too big to fail’. Poor studies, errant conclusions, propped up again and again because without them researchers would be up a creek. Too foundational to work to challenge.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3.  🏴James Heathers 🏴‏ @jamesheathers 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @pegleraj

          Isn't that the most poisonous idea, 'too big to fail'. Applies to the literal AND contextual research area. I always think of forensic science during the discussion of this issue, and the evidence base for polygraphs and fingerprints.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
        4. Adam Pegler‏ @pegleraj 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @jamesheathers

          Yeah it’s a real problem and I don’t intend to defend it. Shit ideas never really go away anyway, they just go somewhere else. Freudian psychoanalytic theory, for example. Still journals dedicated to it.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        5. End of conversation
        1. Helen Wilson‏ @premodernism 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @jamesheathers @PsychRabble

          You are supposed to call it "backlash" and not cite it.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Josh Nicholson‏ @joshmnicholson 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @jamesheathers

          Josh Nicholson Retweeted scite

          Most don't even cite it! https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2680 … Hopefully we can help highlight critical studies and make it harder for authors to brush aside/ignore:https://twitter.com/sciteai/status/1055927904717160449 …

          Josh Nicholson added,

          scite @sciteai
          A short thread on the value of http://scite.ai : This study in Biological Psychiatry from 2006 has been cited 332 times. The journal is "one of the most selective and highly cited journals in the field of psychiatric neuroscience.... https://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/S0006-3223(05)01001-2/fulltext … pic.twitter.com/zwpWYbhYKt
          Show this thread
          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. J.P. de Ruiter‏ @JPdeRuiter 27 Oct 2018
          Replying to @jamesheathers

          "Changing one's mind is for losers." That might be one reason why the Monty Hall problem is so hard.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info