So, here's a thing. We figured the right would want to turn on the peer-review system and burn it to the ground as a result of our project. We even took steps to minimize the force of that foolish attempt. We didn't expect the left to do it to protect grievance studies, though.
-
-
Replying to @ConceptualJames
The logical right respects and grasps peer-review. The left will burn it to the ground as soon as the electorate hands them the box of matches.
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @BoomKlop @ConceptualJames
Anyone who respects peer review is ignorant and superstitious for, predictably, peer review has become dominated by the consensus of the ignorant and superstitious, which is what inexorably happens when you generate truth by social consensus.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jamesd23x @ConceptualJames
Meant respect, in the sense it’s a mechanism within the Scientific community & must be dealt with there. Instead of burnt down for political reasons. Agreed it’s flawed, but that is for scientists to deal with, not society in general.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
In 1663 the Puritans physically attacked the Royal Society because they did not like the scientific method. Charles the Second shut them down with military power. Puritans move to New England, form Harvard. In 1944, finish what they failed to do in 1663
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.