To restrain female sexual choice, needs male collective action. Male collective action against females needs a moral code that female sexual choice is bad, and white knights are defectors. A moral code that alphas are defectors is the opposite of the solution.
You blame men for female misbehavior. You are white knighting in the hope that women will fuck you, but they will not.
-
-
You think I'm trying to pick up women through this thread? What a pathetic strawman.
-
Apparently expecting Alphas to behave like true inspiring leaders like they should be is "white knighting". You think back in tribal times betas followed alphas because they were attractive to women? No they didn't care about what women thought of him..
-
They followed alphas because they inspired them through strength, power and sometimes fear. But in totality they were leaders! What people call "alphas" today are nothing more than aristocrats that became decadent and lost their sense of noblesse oblige.
-
Consumed by materialist desire, they hold no followers other than those envious of their material wealth and hedonistic lifestyles. They inspire no one other than those who desire hedonism themselves.
-
In fact your original statement belies the notion of "alpha" and "beta" . You set up an idea of egalitarianism among men, yet simultaneously state that alphas exist and must be immune from criticism. Alphas and Betas cannot be equal. Alphas are the leaders and betas followers.
-
If Alphas reject their role as leaders and seek simply the passions of sex, it is nothing more than dereliction of duty and betrayal of all men.
-
In fact, it extends beyond simply men, but civilization itself. Alphas are supposed to be great leaders at the highest stratum of society. A decadent society can only be the result of decadent leaders who fail their subjects.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.