Building and teaching JavaScript at http://frontarm.com 
たまに日本語
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Reasons to avoid default exports: - Now you can always export * from './module' - Add exports to files with less worries about naming - No scratching your head for imports... "was that a default or not?"
Reasons to break the rule: - Functions like React.lazy take a module as an argument, and you don't want to customize the function for each module. Use a default export. - You're importing many files at once, e.g. with a Webpack context. Use a default export.
Why are there less worries about naming? Named exports require naming, no?
Named exports require to name thing once. No worries about naming on usage.
- Less chaotic imports section. All imports starts with {
I’m not convinced... Generally I would have a default export per file, then if I need to export a group of files, I throw them in a folder and export each (export { default as Name } from ‘’) in an index file. This defines a more public module, defualt imports are nice internally
Yeah default export was a mistake :/
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
