I found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz_v._Universal_Music_Corp … But it might be hard to prove that UMG didnt "consider—in good faith and prior to sending a takedown notification—whether allegedly infringing material constitutes fair use" Which is what the case sets precedent for.
-
-
I guess I should also mention the fact that when content creators dispute these frivilous claims, YouTube will quite often respond that they investigated your counterclaim and found that no, the copyright claim from the claimant is correct. YouTube is making the statement to the
-
content creator that no, they (the content creator) are in fact breaking copyright / dmca, even though they are not. YouTube is making this statement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then take that up with the US government?
-
Why? It's on YouTube if they want to punish them or not, that's why it's being taken up with YouTube. And as I said further, YouTube is specifically making the statement that you are lying when they respond that they found the claim to be valid, even when it's not. That is a
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.