Or how about Jim Sterling vs Digital Homicide:https://youtu.be/qS-LXvhy1Do
-
-
Replying to @jakiraokami @jess689_ and
Yes but the only punishment youtube could try to pursue is a lawsuit over these so called "false dmca" cases, but I don't know what law they broke or how they caused youtube any damages?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
Filing a false Copyright claim or DMCA Takedown is illegal as far as I know. That is the law that they are breaking. The punishment is up to YouTube to decide, currently, they have chosen to have zero punishment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jakiraokami @jess689_ and
I found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz_v._Universal_Music_Corp … But it might be hard to prove that UMG didnt "consider—in good faith and prior to sending a takedown notification—whether allegedly infringing material constitutes fair use" Which is what the case sets precedent for.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
that's correct. It's technically on the company / person filing it to know if they are doing it in good faith or not. But you should also see that this doesn't stop youtube for punishing them after they have been found to have done it not in good faith.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jakiraokami @jess689_ and
I don't get what punishment you are refering to, the only thing that can happen is them getting sued due to missuse of dmca. They literally can't stop companies like UMG to continue to use the DMCA system source:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512 … [(i)(2)(B) specifically]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
Any punishment at all. This law does -not- stop YouTube from punishing people that are filing false DMCA / Copyright. There is no law that stops YouTube from punishing them. They can't pre-empetively punish them, obviously, but after they have been found to have done it, YouTube
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jakiraokami @Bucket_Of_Crabs and
makes the concious decision not to do -any- punishment whatsoever to the people or companies doing false copyright claims / strikes or DMCA takedowns. I'm not sure why I keep having to repeat this to you? The whole point is that YouTube -currently- does -not- give -any-
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jakiraokami @jess689_ and
Give me some kind of example as to what kinds of punishment, because the only punishment that makes sense is the ones defined in:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act#%C2%A7_512(f)_Misrepresentations … Which will happen when the case goes to trial, with the the victim and the the media company
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
I gave you examples, but those are just my opinion on what kind of punishment should be given. Again, the whole problem is that YouTube is giving NO punishments, at all, ever. Even if you take the person to court and you win, YouTube still doesn't punish them, and they can go
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
straight back to youtube to do it. There's even been companies whose entire business is false copyright claims. I do believe they are still around.
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.