Following up: Our Copyright team looked into this & confirmed that the claim is valid. We see that you’ve appealed the claim, which provides UMG with 30 days to review your appeal. If you would like to resolve the issue directly with them, please DM us for more info.
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube @thelindsayellis
That’s a fuckin’ y i k e s from mepic.twitter.com/2Q3lEtDq23
1 reply 1 retweet 373 likes -
It's how the DMCA system works. Get mad at
@UMG They made the claim and confirmed it's not false. The creator appealed now its back to@UMG. Here wordpress explains their process https://en.support.wordpress.com/our-dmca-process/ … Notice the webmaster/host must follow this to not be held liable.7 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @TeamYouTube and
Hope they call you back bro
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @jess689_ @TeamYouTube and
It just doesn't make sense to get mad at people for following the letter of the law. It is the media companies abusing the DMCA system not youtube. The only other option for Youtube is to take personal responsibility for other peoples use or missuse of copyright.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
There are plenty of other reasons to criticize Youtube that is valid, ie they're new ad polices regarding ad friendly content determined by some ambiguous algorithm that constantly contradicts itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
The problem stems from the fact that YouTube does not punish the misuse of DMCA/Copyright but they do punish the people that are being wrongfully targeted. And last I checked at the very least, misuse of DMCA/Copyright is illegal, but IANAL so I could be wrong on that.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @jakiraokami @jess689_ and
What do you mean by "YouTube does not punish the misuse of DMCA/Copyright but they do punish the people that are being wrongfully targeted." How do you propose to punish them? How is Youtube punishing the people wrongfully targeted?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and
That one should be quite self-explanatory. But okay, I'll try and break it down for you. Person A submits a video that follows the law. Person B files a copyright claim or dmca claim spuriously YouTube grants the copyright/dmca claim to Person B Person A denies it, it goes back
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jakiraokami @Bucket_Of_Crabs and
to Person B If this happens to you, you can become limited on YouTube, for instance, you can't live stream, you can't monetize so on and so forth. Meanwhile, nothing ever happens to Person B. Even if Person A shows that Person B is in the wrong, YouTube does not punish Person B
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
How should Person B have been punished? Well, to be quite frank, the exact same way content creators are. 3 strikes and you're out. 3 spurious copyright / dmca claims, lose the right to file any further copyright / dmca claims.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.