I stand corrected: I thought this RNC ad misquoted me, but the quote came from a TV hit. So I've deleted my previous tweet about this. Big picture point: Wolff's errors are sloppy, but many Trump experts say the book "rings true" overall. My advice: Read it — skeptically
Conversation
Having many errors but “ringing true” is not a journalistic standard.
That said, quotes are quotes. And if facts can be ascertained by further reporting as true, that’s also a service.
101
62
347
People who dislike Trump will believe everything, even if untrue. Those who like Trump will disbelieve, even if true. To those of us who dislike Trump but like accurate facts, will likely be disappointed. Sloppy work discredits and diminishes the value of good reporting.
2
4
12
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Before the election:
-mocked a handicapped reporter
-Access Hollywood tape released
-called Mexicans drug dealers and rapists
-tried to get an American judge removed because he was "Mexican"
-didn't pay contactors
-birtherism
-Central Park 5
We knew, many just didn't care!
2
1
Book would be a none story if Trump didn’t respond to it. He is the one that gives book any credibility. Normal prez wouldn’t even acknowledge this or any other foolish criticism for that matter.
2
1
6
clearly understands that an 🍎 is an 🍎 and not a 🍌, as for , he sees an 🍎 but he may still be screaming 🍌. #TheMostTrustedFruitSaladOnCable
2
4
Who are these “many Trump experts”? Names or are they just “sources” again?
1
7