Then they have to make their own platform. And they won’t/can’t.
Not sure. Again, any company is free to deplatform for TOS breaches. Maybe this is one - haven’t looked into it, only watched a few Crowder vids long ago. No 1st Amndt. has been violated, but the CULTURE of free speech and debate is stifled when we rush to deplatform.
-
-
He’s only been not allowed to monetize the videos where he’s hocking the “socialism is for fags” shirts. He’s still able to post. On the flip, isn’t the other side just as guilty of violating free speech when you try to tell YouTube they have to do something w/ their platform?
-
I haven’t been tracking their statements, and I’d agree (as I did with xdck) that legally compelling YT would be a 1st A (and 5A) violation, not a 1A defense. But the 1A “doesn’t shield you[tube] from criticism or consequences.” Users have a right to complain about features.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.