And, the same people do not demand medical expertise on issues such as abortion. This is silly season.
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who are you referring to?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not to mention, judges have nothing to do with climate policy.
-
The reasoning in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) rests on background assumptions about the science of climate change.https://www.justice.gov/enrd/massachusetts-v-epa …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who pretends that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just don't get why she has to know anything about climate change to do constitutional law. That won't change how cases are argued or whether something is constitutional or not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.