"people" here seems to include folks at the Lancet. Even on its own terms, the study was of limited use if you read the fine print.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
Who can we trust at this point?
-
Good idea is just to ignore everything the media ever says about anything.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
John, I know it’s politics all the way down for you, but maybe you should consider whether this is just your confirmation bias? Seems clear this was a fraudulent firm. But the medical community did not determine that hydroxycholoroquine was unsafe and ineffective based on them.
-
This is the same logic as: Steele dossier has some unverified claim in it, therefore the investigations in Carter Page and George Papdiculous are unnecessary. Don’t be blinded to the overwhelming facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this is on the lancet. not sure how that study got by peer review but they need to investigate and get to the bottom of it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
are there studies that show hydroxychloroquine effective?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is certainly sad not to be able to trust the Lancet's scientific acumen or scientific integrity. But that is no call to imagine that
#trump has any scientific acumen or scientific integrity (and we already know he has little acumen and no integrity of any other kind, either)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.