Well done. Would love to see additional reporting on how Historical Commissions/Boards impact exclusionary zoning practices!
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Incredible piece, thank you for shining another light on what must change - we all have to be open to hard conversations - we must do better
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
This 1000%.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Outstanding! Should be required reading for every town board of P&Z
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
The concern about how the accusation of segregation will reflect personally on the board members outweighs the concern about the de facto segregation itself. Rhetoric of "protecting property values" frames alternatives, without evidence, as lowering them, when that's unproven.
-
At least that's what I saw in the linked video. Whew.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
If they said black dentist would that have been ok? No, of course not. They'd still be racists, right? I'm sympathetic to enabling the market to build the housing the market wants. But, labeling people racists to win your argument, is going to prove unproductive. cc
@ColleenFree -
Actually, saying a Black dentist would've been better than a tone deaf reference to a fictional representation of Black people. Stop the whole "what the market wants" narrative. The "wants" don't come from some ether, they're influenced by policy & determined by biased humans.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.