"After intimating that West might be arrested for harboring a #fugitive, Officer Matthew Richardon asked, "Do we have permission to get inside your house
and apprehend him?" West nodded, handed over the key
to her front door, and left with a friend who came to pick her up
-
-
-
Instead of entering the house,Sgt Joe Hoadley summoned a SWAT team,which hatched a 3-stage plan of attack that included "us[ing] 12-gauge shotguns to inject tear gas into the house
thru the windows & the garage door," as 2 members of a 3-judge 9th Circuit panel described it"
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Nope, and the State should pay for any and all damages.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This is exactly why NO police entry without a warrant! NO EXCEPTIONS! This woman, after being intimidated, voluntary gave he permission for law enforcement to enter her home, they trash it, not held responsible! This is unacceptable!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Unfortunately it gives them the right to search. The police individually should be liable for damage from a warrant less search that does not present a immediate danger.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
No. Hope the judges see it that way.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
DO NOT LET THE POLICE INSIDE YOUR HOUSE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
"a barrage of tear gas grenades that would smash her windows, tear holes in her walls and ceiling," They constitute a violation of right to privacy just as much as trespassing
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.