Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @jackquick7

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @jackquick7

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The flaw in Lamar Alexander’s argument is that other GOP senators voted no on witnesses and claimed there wasn’t enough evidence to prove guilt. He should’ve voted for witnesses/docs to help fellow senators get to where they could have made their own determination.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    And right after, Chuck asked if Trump’s inappropriate behavior started before the July 25th phone call, and Lamar said “I don’t know about that”. Maybe witnesses and documents might have helped, eh ? .

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Trump claims Bloomberg is demanding a "box" to stand on in the next debate Despite the DNC rule change, Bloomberg hasn't even qualified yet for the next debate, so Trump is just making this up Now this lie will be broadcast, without fact-checking, to millions

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj
    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    I'm a troll says the person who showed up on my time-line out of fucking nowhere just to say "I don't want Bernie as president" Lol ok boomer.

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  6. 2. velj

    Wow can you believe the audacity in booing Hillary? Truly depraved stuff amirite?

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Trump loves to hire the “best people”. Case in point: Jay Sekulow—one of the prominent members of his legal team. A review of his tax returns shows that $65M+ in charitable funds were paid to him & his family—who used it to buy homes, chauffeur-driven cars & even a private jet.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    For some reason I just remembered this 1995 clip of absolutely going off on (future convicted felon) Rep. Duke Cunningham after Cunningham launched into a homophobic rant during debate on the Clean Water Act

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Solomon forgot to mention that this is the same oligarch who gave Donald Trump a cool $150,000 through his foundation for a single speech by video in 2015

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Hi Ben, Wondering when you would speak up: "Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) managed to be even more timorous" ..."Lamar speaks for lots and lots of us and refusing to elaborate." I remember you as a young PhD student, principled & outspoken. What has happened here? Your history teacher

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    ...is “what it takes” marrying the president’s daughter?

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    When they call Trumpian, they tell on themselves. They reveal that they object to Trump not for his cruelty -- jailing children, taking food stamps from hungry people, raping our planet -- but for his rudeness, and his contempt for their particularly beloved elites.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Well now this is something. The departed Rep. Duncan Hunter, fresh off pleading guilty to gross misuse of campaign funds for personal use, posts a report that shows a solid $475.5K raised in Q4.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    so, just realizing the deadline to register in TX is MONDAY! if you're not doing it to vote in the presidential election... maybe you'll be inspired by all the local power at stake?

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Using the threat of violence to affect political change only works if the ordinary person is sufficiently afraid. Example A and example B aren't different, they are a functioning unit. Example A gets what he wants because of the action Example B took.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    On the left, an armed man entering a government building to exercise his right to peaceful protest. On the right, an armed man entering a government building to murder people. In all sincerity, how is any ordinary person supposed to know the difference & respond appropriately?

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    The “rushed and flawed” argument is a fig leaf. It was flawed only because Trump stonewalled House subpoenas. It was rushed because going to court to enforce them would take us past the election, the very thing Trump’s impeachable misconduct is trying to rig. Roy Cohn wins again.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The 49 Senators who lost the vote on witnesses represent 19 million MORE people than the 51 Senators who won.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Me: And the PRESIDENT is on trial! And the whole time, the PRESIDENT'S OWN LAWYER AT THE TIME was a WITNESS to the crime, and KNOWS THE TRUTH! Studio Exec: Oh come on. Ridiculous. Studio Exec 2: Plus it has no likable characters.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·