Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization. We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies. More here:https://yt.be/help/xLtT
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
“Look this guy said some stuff we didn’t like, that didn’t jive with our political agenda so we had to demonotize him”
2 replies 3 retweets 22 likes -
Yeah companies should never have control over the content they host, what is this, a free a country? Your side decided corporations were people with free speech rights, enjoy!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jackiebchipotle @Lumacas and
No rules or regulations of YouTube were violated. This decision was based on FEELS not something someone did wrong. Are they in control of that decision, you bet they are. Is everyone else allowed to crap on them for it. YUP!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FreddiePoster @Lumacas and
Great! Tell everyone how shitty you think it is. You can’t argue that they’re somehow breaking the law or limiting free speech though - they aren’t the state, they can’t do that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackiebchipotle @Lumacas and
Who said anything about them violating the 1st Amendment? LMAO! We're consumers & we hold the power here. You're having an argument, & no one else is having it with you. Your agenda was just exposed and failed. Nice try tho. The
#Antitrust that's coming should be fun tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FreddiePoster @Lumacas and
“Your agenda was just exposed and failed” lmao eggy Freddie here getting super heated. I like how you think antitrust regulation will still somehow take away their right to publish content as they choose, like any publisher. No one has a right to a “monetized” opinion buddy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackiebchipotle @FreddiePoster and
If I were writing for a newspaper or magazine or producing digital content for any of those entities, my employers would have an absolute right to fire me (demonitize me, if you will) if they don’t like the content I’m producing. This isn’t hard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackiebchipotle @FreddiePoster and
The dislike of the content doesn’t even have to come directly from the org - if readers or consumers complain, again, antitrust not gonna take away any orgs right to control their content.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackiebchipotle @FreddiePoster and
What you don’t like is that enough people putting pressure on an org hosting content they find objectionable can move an org to change or take action. Not sure why this free exchange between people and orgs bothers you so much, they make decisions in their $$ interest as always.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It’s the same freedom that allows orgs to make decisions *i* don’t like, that are in the orgs financial interests. I’m free to stop using and supporting that org however. Good luck arguing YouTube is somehow a public utility.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.