Its a shame that Dee/default_friend deleted her twitter, as the internet-history-as-oral question she's raising is a real one, though sort of not in the way that she's approaching it. I'll explain.
-
Show this thread
-
Before writing was invented, histories were retrieved by memory and transmitted through speech because there was no enduring, tangible way to preserve information. Yeah, yeah, we all know this.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
But the internet counterintuitively behaves as a great information eraser. It depends upon the latest technology to access, retrieve, and then transmit information. And what happens when a given amount of information has only been captured by an obsolete technology?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Edwin_Aponte_
There aren't that many truly obsolete data storage or transfer methods. While tape players may not be widespread anymore, they are simple machines to make and operate. Any DVD player will play a CD as well, and data from old hard drives readily transfers to flash storage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken
Of course that’s literally true, but that doesn’t keep most of that information from disappearing. Someone has to *consciously* convert the data.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Edwin_Aponte_
I tend to think the problem will go the other way: without the ability to view a running feed in real time, public blog posts and chat messages will be archived [albeit spottily] but difficult to review due to their volume. Look at how many tweets Trump had.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To be fair, most stuff is hosted privately, and some hosts would sooner delete their archives than hand a copy to an archivist. I don't think that's Big Tech's way, though. I figure/hope everything you put into Twitter, FB, Google etc lives forever for better or worse.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.