I attempted a respectful exit from this exchange, having concluded (correctly) that we would not get anywhere, which you replied to by doubly insulting me, so for you to lecture me about treating people with respect is pretty rich:https://twitter.com/anti_minotaur/status/1434671061061316610 …
-
-
Replying to @daily_barbarian
Yeah, if people are going to deflect from their blatant misrepresentations by saying "Well we just disagree on too many premises" I'm going to call them on it. This whole convo is a giant deflection from the fact that guy never said or implied anything you imputed to him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur
Twitter dot com salutes you for your brave call out of dangerous misinformation!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @daily_barbarian
Hilarious. But I suspect the reason you're not arguing the point is because you know you have no leg to stand on and just want to chalk it up to hyperbole.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur
I’m not arguing the point because there’s no purpose in doing so! You already reject all of my views on all of this, and there is no conceivable scenario in which you would accept the implications I draw from the OP. The opposite is also true.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @daily_barbarian
In a certain sense that's true. I don't have any premises that require me to contort what other people say into obviously ridiculous positions no one holds. Or, to the extent I do, I would like to get rid of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur
If you think that your arguments don’t proceed from tacitly assumed premises, you’re deluded. And I call utter BS on the second point, since the fact that you aggressively attack only one sort of Covid take is no coincidence.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @daily_barbarian
I do have premises, I just don't have ones that require me to misinterpret what people are saying for them to be sustained. As for the latter point there is one side of the covid debate that is much, much more unreasonable than the other, on other issues I'm more balanced.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anti_minotaur
On the latter point, I agree: your side, which wants to reorient society around the futile attempt to eliminate an endemic and not particularly lethal virus is far, far more unreasonable. Guess we can leave it there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daily_barbarian
"Zero covid" isn't really a position many people hold. It was the policy of Australia when they had no community spread. Most people on my side of the fence want measures - restrictions, voluntary isolation, vaccines - until the virus ceases to create mass death.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I actually want involuntary isolation, which worked in China well before any vaccine had been developed. It's an obvious no-go in the US but I don't really understand why. Nobody is allergic to sitting in an air-conditioned trailer at a KOA for two weeks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.