In general, Rt depends on seasonality, societal behavior and population immunity. States that opened early had summer surges that resulted in perhaps 15% to 20% of the population infected before immunity and behavior brought surges under control. 6/14https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1291860659118804992 …
-
Show this thread
-
Here I'm demonstrating this relationship in a contour plot that shows how social connectivity and population immunity influence Rt. In August, the US as a whole was roughly on the dashed line of Rt = 1. 7/14pic.twitter.com/IpdWZ4iawD
3 replies 21 retweets 204 likesShow this thread -
Over the course of Sep and Oct, seasonality crept in and increased Rt by perhaps 20%. 8/14
2 replies 15 retweets 177 likesShow this thread -
This increase in Rt due to seasonality tilted the dynamic equilibrium towards transmission. Here, I'm showing the same plot of social connectivity and population immunity but with a 20% increase in R0 due to seasonality. 9/14pic.twitter.com/f5tHS9gJDa
3 replies 36 retweets 228 likesShow this thread -
You can see that where we had been at Rt ~1 (shown as the black dot) now corresponds to Rt ~1.15 and results in an exponentially growing epidemic. 10/14
1 reply 16 retweets 183 likesShow this thread -
We now have a choice in terms of how we get back to Rt<1. The virus "wants" to take us to the right towards more infections, where population immunity brings transmission back down. Alternatively, we can scale back social connectivity to curb transmission. 11/14pic.twitter.com/6q3JcXskx9
8 replies 88 retweets 338 likesShow this thread -
A US-wide epidemic with Rt = 1.15 will result in an additional 25% of the population infected before the epidemic is resolved, while an epidemic with Rt = 1.2 will result in an additional ~30% of the population infected. 12/14
2 replies 50 retweets 275 likesShow this thread -
We're approaching these numbers in Wisconsin (310k total cases for ~1.2M infections in a population of 5.8M for ~21% of the state infected) and North Dakota (60k total cases for ~240k infections in a population of 760k for ~32% of the state infected). 13/14
11 replies 48 retweets 278 likesShow this thread -
If we don't take action soon the virus will decide for us. An eventual 30% of the US infected would correspond to ~450k deaths (at an IFR of 0.45%) and many more cases of
#longcovid. 14/1472 replies 334 retweets 861 likesShow this thread -
It's out of Trevor's area of expertise so I don't think he comments much. I suspect internal travel restrictions would make a dent, but they haven't been floated. Real quarantines, where you essentially imprison someone for two weeks, would help - also not an option politically
-
-
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @Ealasaid1743
I think we’ll get another experiment here in comparing Europe (with a fresh round of lockdowns) to the US. I’ve really wanted a targeted / real-time understanding of settings driving transmission so that we could have smarter decisions about restrictions to put in place.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.