A lot of people assume that the pandemic and mass joblessness means that the election is effectively over and Trump has no chance of winning. I am one of them.
-
Show this thread
-
The argument pushed relentlessly through the convention that Trump is an essentially inert figure and that the pandemic necessitated leadership of the kind he was incapable of offering seems exactly right
7 replies 9 retweets 96 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @wesyang
The problem is the Dems were similarly inert at critical moments. They're hoping their role as 'opposition' works to obscure this but I'm not so sure
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken
DeBlasio was within his domain arguably worse than Trump. But he's not the President and doesn't bear overall responsibility for a nation where unemployment levels exceeds those of the Great Depression.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ignore the stock trades themselves. What do they tell us as evidence of what was said in that Senate briefing?pic.twitter.com/TCalrpmZ19
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The correct political move for Trump (as it had been prior to corona) was massive state sponsored heavy industrial buildout and federal lockdown recs. The correct move for the DNC was pushing him to do it. Instead both sides allowed policy to devolve to mayors and school boards.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.