A lot of people assume that the pandemic and mass joblessness means that the election is effectively over and Trump has no chance of winning. I am one of them.
Show this thread
-
The argument pushed relentlessly through the convention that Trump is an essentially inert figure and that the pandemic necessitated leadership of the kind he was incapable of offering seems exactly right
Show this thread
The problem is the Dems were similarly inert at critical moments. They're hoping their role as 'opposition' works to obscure this but I'm not so sure
-
-
DeBlasio was within his domain arguably worse than Trump. But he's not the President and doesn't bear overall responsibility for a nation where unemployment levels exceeds those of the Great Depression.
-
And Congressional Dems?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Dems had no influence on the president's dismantling of pandemic readiness tools over the last 4 years, nor over his narcissism and inability to separate his ego from his job and listen to experts. Cuomo and de Blasio failed too, but the deeper failure is Trump's.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.