Well yes, you've established you are not concerned with petty matters like evidence and plausibility when it comes to your preferred narrative.
-
I don’t see why possibly defendIng himself with a gun during a hit attempt by these other people would suddenly prove that they weren’t set up by the cops to do it.
For one thing, why was he armed in the first place? Why did he have enough weed to keep the apartment building stoned for five years? If it was planted, how did the cops prevent anyone from seeing them plant it? Why haven't the men implicated the cops? How do I prove a negative?
-
-
On the weight of the evidence, it either was a drug deal gone wrong or it was a hit by the cops. One piece of speculative evidence, the timing, suggests it was a hit. Every other piece of evidence suggests a drug deal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The first question seems to be a silly question to ask of anyone who lives in Texas, regardless of their race or background.
-
So by the same token the plan was to call him out to his parking lot unexpectedly in the middle of the night in order to assassinate him, and this plan basically worked except they weren't anticipating he might suspect their motives.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.