I keep being told (and want to believe) that whether people are culturally liberal or conservative is irrelevant, but then I actively hear pushing socially conservative messaging is the way forward. Why concede that social conservatism has a monopoly on non-market relationships?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Why doesn't the definitional problem hold for (or does it?) for Marxism? I guess I just don't get why we need to concede this point, to me it seems like a Faustian bargain, which didn't work for the left when recruiting liberals.
It's a problem of explicitly adopting any named ideology, yes. The repressed horror of our times is that in the end it's other people who determine your identity.
-
-
Sure but then if the utility of either accepting or rejecting that identity is equivalent, why prefer going with their flow?
-
Oh yeah I don't subscribe to it, that's kinda why I initially asked what you meant by socially conservative. Cause like, Noah Hawley quotes Bible verses but he appears to be the only guy with the stones to take on Google.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.