The problem with this is it would break the independence of the judiciary and make convictions and trials into tools for political benefit. https://twitter.com/BMStudebaker/status/1268563771791937539 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BMStudebaker
Right so you just want a cleverly-managed show trial. Do you have any prior commitments to the independence of the judiciary in interpreting the laws or do you think it should be a tool of the executive state?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @martymacmarty
This is not what I want This is what is most expedient for the state I want us to make more robust demands that cannot be so easily undermined by the outcome of a criminal trial
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It doesn't, actually. It's accurate but deceptive to say they "raised the level," because the third degree charge is included in the second degree charge and the jury can still decide to convict on it even if they don't buy the case for second degree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The net effect of raising the level of the charge was to add a new charge without foreclosing the old one. Ellison will still argue both charges.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.