JF

At work so forgive if somewhat underdeveloped. But again, this is a culture war analysis.

Rather then examining the conditions that produced the riot and treating it as smth part of an integrated whole you’re fixated on the meaningless thoughts of individual cultural commentators and using this to stamp out the inherent contradictions that exist within the riot

By virtue of its “racialist” aesthetic it is therefore a “racialised riot” that is somehow distinct, and independent of, working class politics. Therefore bc PMCs peddle race-reductionist narratives this means they must both support and be an influential part of the riots

Both incorrect The composition of the riots are transparently normie. They’re people reacting to their immediate concrete circumstances (albeit without the capacity to create revolutionary change).

Contrast this with their “international allies”; petty bourgeois “radicals” divorced from any material struggle and simply engaging in aesthetic expressions of “solidarity”.