Hot take: John C Calhoun was not a “reactionary” as libs would brand him in order to build a gulf between themselves. He was in actuality a very typical liberal well within the confines of Andrew Fletcher and Francis Lieber’s political philosophy.
-
-
I think his books on Liberalism and his defense of the Revolutionary Tradition against the Revisionists (like Francois Furet) to be extraordinary works personally. But yeah his Stalinism is whack though I’ve been meaning to read his book on Stalin.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.