-
-
Replying to @HenryKrinkIe
Why not? What do you think brought this disease into contact with humans? Just because it isn't a realistic geopolitical possibility doesn't make it obviously wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @HenryKrinkIe
Well if we're going down that road it seems obvious that they have a pretty strong claim against England, for example.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @runclepennybags @HenryKrinkIe
Hmm yes what could be the difference between these two situations? It's real brain strain!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @HenryKrinkIe
Well one of them is a deliberate act of rapacity while another is a claim of mishandling of natural disaster but that's probably not the difference you have in mind
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @runclepennybags @HenryKrinkIe
One of them is ongoing and one happened over 100 years ago. Missing this simple point seems borderline disingenuous.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @HenryKrinkIe
Seems like an obviously self-serving move to choose this in particular as our starting point.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Also I don't see how the US is in any position whatsoever to accuse other parties of negligent handling of coronavirus
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yes you do, you're being disingenuous again. China's simple responsibility after SARS was to ban the sale of live wildlife within its borders. It did not do so. No other country made anything close to an equivalent error.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.