1/ So, what was going on at @CDCgov from Jan-March, against the mounting threat of coronavirus?
Based on hundreds of pages of emails we got our hands on: fumbling communications between federal and state agencies + general chaos. A few “jokes.”
Take a look for yourself:
-
Show this thread
-
2/ On Jan. 28, the CDC was reporting 5 cases of COVID-19. The CDC’s director, Dr. Robert Redfield, assured employees “the virus is not spreading in the U.S. at this time.”pic.twitter.com/ad53ZfQYGU
35 replies 681 retweets 1,252 likesShow this thread -
3/ By Feb. 13, the agency was struggling with one of its most important duties: keeping track of Americans suspected of having COVID-19. “Help needed urgently,” one email said.
5 replies 397 retweets 1,144 likesShow this thread -
4/ The CDC had “an ongoing issue” with organizing — and sometimes flat-out losing — forms sent by local agencies about people thought to be infected. The email listed job postings for people who could track paperwork. This was in FEBRUARY.pic.twitter.com/i6IrWgTl97
14 replies 489 retweets 1,153 likesShow this thread -
5/ That same week, the agency sent Nevada officials alerts about 80 potential coronavirus patients to monitor, documents show. Four were not Nevada residents.
3 replies 303 retweets 949 likesShow this thread -
6/ In March, a program manager in the Nevada Health Department asked the CDC about congressional funding for COVID-19. “There seems to be a communications blackout on this end,” the program manager wrote.
1 reply 308 retweets 925 likesShow this thread -
7/ “Unfortunately, there is no clear answer to your questions,” a CDC staffer replied. “It’s good to be confused together,” the Nevada employee responded.pic.twitter.com/3aLyjFUTTT
5 replies 319 retweets 893 likesShow this thread -
8/ On Feb. 19, the CDC described criteria to be tested: close contact with a confirmed case or travel to China + had respiratory symptoms + a fever. But the CDC’s own guidance from Jan. 17 had a footnote that said “fever may not be present in some patients.” What?
7 replies 382 retweets 1,113 likesShow this thread -
9/ In a statement to
@ProPublica, the CDC said clinicians could always use their judgment to decide who received a test: “CDC never declined a request for testing that came from a state or local health department,” the agency said.10 replies 235 retweets 750 likesShow this thread
It was up to the state and local health departments and doctors to deny the test due to the patient not meeting the criteria.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.