we love to move a virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger. this word salad definitely justifies altering a virus specifically to make it capable of infecting humans, to me
-
Show this thread
-
Oedipa Maas Retweeted Madeleine Thompson
lmao this guy is doing Sanjay Gupta episodes about """hunting""" the virus right nowhttps://twitter.com/mad_th/status/1237022303638224896 …
Oedipa Maas added,
1 reply 2 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
I haven't listened but to be clear, they did not *find* or "hunt" this virus capable of infecting people in the wild somewhere, they purposefully created it for this study to show it was "more possible than they had thought" as part of their "gain-of-function" researchpic.twitter.com/13i3vkd73s
1 reply 3 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
still Extremely Upset about this story. even assuming the research is innocent, the only point of it would be to demonstrate that with some VERY unlucky evolution, it's *distantly* plausible that something like COVID-19 could have come from a natural population. which ... ......
5 replies 2 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @bridgietherease
I think what they showed was that it wasn't distant at all. Indeed, it had already happened twice by the time that study came out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken
you're saying there were two other coronavirus outbreaks?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @jackfruitstaken
sorry, was just about to delete & rephrase once I realized what you meant! if that was the case though, they could research the ways it had already done so, no? not create new ones? also, https://www.the-scientist.com/news-analysis/sars-escaped-beijing-lab-twice-50137 …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bridgietherease
I think there's value in watching for future threats. There's a bird flu in China that kills humans mercilessly (at least 30% CFR) but has never gone person to person. I'll agree we shouldn't play around but we have to watch for what might happen.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H7N9 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken
I tend to disagree - how would you distinguish this from a covert biological weapons program, for example?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Well in some sense that's exactly what it is. The reason researchers don't see it that way is that nobody actually gains anything from releasing one of these bad boys. And it highlights the fact that animal keeping practices create free range viral weapon projects.
-
-
Replying to @jackfruitstaken
idk, not buying it personally. "someone" would have a lot to gain from releasing the right thing in the right way, that is not convincing to me at all
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
new ep