"It's bad when centrists do X, it's so cynical, you know they don't really mean it yikes cringe etc" This endorses the logic of X, ascribing normative weight to "pure" usage and condemning cynical deployment. But cynical vs pure is idealistic drivel. Politicians want power.
Look at it this way: You want a set of rules, right? Everyone does. Systems emerge from the rules that constrain them. How could we constrain a movement in such a way that it prevents capture by allies of the working class learning the right sort of language and attitude?
-
-
We might start by considering whether the categories we ascribe to individuals are really so meaningful in the grand scheme. Personality traits, party affiliation, named dogma, preferred porn genre. Could we make a system that runs even if everyone is a kind of a jerk? Cause uh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*ruling class
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Again, Hegel. I like the US constitution a lot, no plans to redraft it, but the movement that has come to challenge liberalism has grown out of liberalism itself. Genie doesn't go back in the bottle.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.