It sounds like he was good against ISIS, which is nice. But I can't help the feeling that Iran is maybe not fully within its rights to lead military operations in Iraq.
Show this thread
So this beloved Iranian general, I'm not going to pretend I had ever heard about him, but it sounds like he "operated out of" Iraq. Is that a normal thing for a general to be doing? Or was he doing this essentially at the sufferance of everyone else who wants a piece of the pie?
-
-
-
I don't want war with Iran but I've seen enough IMMINENT WAR WITH IRAN headlines in my lifetime to look very carefully at each crisis and think whether anyone really wants millions (on both sides) to die over this.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm currently studying wikipedia articles to become an expert but right now all I can tell you is "Quds Force" is a silly name for an intelligence agency
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Bolton, despite being a war hawk, was a diplomat and not a soldier. If Iran had killed Petraeus in Iraq there would have been massive grumbling and a sense that it was more or less fair play - what exactly was he doing there
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.