You don't understand the concept and/or are being willfully obtuse. But then you also created a neologism to accuse marxists of being right wing racists, so why would we take your word on bad faith arguments?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @andraydomise @RickyRawls
I try not to think too closely about the way his murderers, their protégés and their hostages, abuse his legacy.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @andraydomise @RickyRawls
Unfortunately ol' Marky Mark ain't around to sort us out. Think that might have something to do with what he spent his life writing about? You know... The infinite alienation of the unfettered rule of capital, and its reinforcement by cynical resort to perspective ontology?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @andraydomise @RickyRawls
I'm saying it's untrue because the tactics and the politics aren't separable. You appear to be claiming that Fisher believed otherwise - T certainly is. Am I misunderstanding? I believe your complaint was that I was flatly contradicting him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I response to that point, I brought up what the essay says, and what Fisher believed. You and T substantively disagree with him, and are attempting to puppeteer his corpse to paper over that fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Notice how you haven't responded to my characterization of Fisher's project? The closest you got was disingenuously pretending standpoint epistemology isn't used synonymously with idpol.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.