It could be I'm overextrapolating from my online experience but Maoism is basically a brain parasite that rules out mass politics in the core because of the degeneracy of the oppressor nation. To be fair this made a lot of sense in the 80s and in 2004 Anglosphere
-
-
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @Shialabeefsteak
It makes a lot of sense from two important angles: settler chauvinism (probably real but historically contingent) and the obvious moral disconnect of the wage differential between first and third world. But it's paralytic. It offers no actionable advice to anyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MoranbongVEVO @Shialabeefsteak
Lest anyone think I was just making this shit up. Keep disciplining those fatcat teachers and nurses buddy, JDPON is on the way, I can feel it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MoranbongVEVO @Shialabeefsteak
I'm not the one drawing a line around the "bad kind" of worker and aligning their interest with Donald Trump. If having a union and getting paid directly out of the coffers of the settler state doesn't make you a labor aristocrat... What does?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MoranbongVEVO @Shialabeefsteak
Yeah... It excludes the bourgeoisie. Duh. Who do you think makes up the first world masses? It's home health aides, nurses, social workers, cashiers, teachers, line cooks and customer service reps. You know, Bernie's constituency.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Lol don't ever tell me I don't understand MTW you fucking worm. As if anyone could read this and think you don't want to take away these people's unearned lucre
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.