Jacobin should owe Bernie - who isn't and cannot be a socialist - nothing. It's a supposedly Indypendent RRRadikal magazine, is it not? But pray tell then, why is Jacobin giving Warren literally any cred? They are 100% for Bernie but also 75% for Warren. Not very socialist.
-
-
Replying to @StupidpolX @joe_faberge and
They openly state that their primary purpose RN is getting Bernie elected. Bhaskar has said that openly in many interviews.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @aimeeterese @joe_faberge and
Killing two birds with one stone: the magazine and Bernie. Good job
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @StupidpolX @joe_faberge and
They wont be harmed because we don't live in a world of socialist readers. Because they have helped shepherd in an era where socialist means no change to anything except maybe hopefully healthcare policy and student loans, they'll have large audience of "socialists" under Warren
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @aimeeterese @joe_faberge and
Let's be real. Market is queen, principles are but pawns. So the task is to change the incentives. Who can do it?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
-
Replying to @aimeeterese @StupidpolX and
There is scope for people to exercise a radically constrained but nonetheless real amount of agency within the limited space we have available. And they chose not to.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RealFacelessMan @StupidpolX and
They set the furthermost left outer limit of the discourse. They had a unique role and responsibility here.pic.twitter.com/QrftLzmb8N
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes
But Chomsky didn't say the magic words! He refuses to say the magic words that we can use to validate his seriousness as a thinker
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.