Fascinating statistics. As obesity rates have skyrocketed in the US and UK, sugar consumption has declined rapidly. This is a serious problem for anyone promoting sugar consumption (especially food companies adding sugar) as the cause of the problem. https://twitter.com/ggkuhnle/status/1092143217213140993 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
For comparison, overweight and obesity rates. There is an inverse relationship between sugar consumption and obesity in the US. The problem is not sugar, it's not fat, and it's not carbs. It's time to stop proposing individual solutions for societal problems.pic.twitter.com/wihZ3INl0p
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Some people have mentioned that this decline has been offset by sweeteners besides sugar, particularly HFCS, which is true up to a point. However total US sweetener usage still peaked in 1999, and has been declining ever since. http://www.stephanguyenet.com/bad-sugar-or-bad-journalism-an-expert-review-of-the-case-against-sugar/ …pic.twitter.com/A2wivQk84E
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @anti_minotaur @miraculate
what do you think the reason is?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AgrippaNothing @miraculate
Structural overproduction in agriculture probably doesn't help, but that crisis predates the beginning of the obesity epidemic by some distance
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @AgrippaNothing
That doesn't sound right to me at all. The problem is not that there's too much food, but that people don't self-regulate the appropriate amount. In fact the people who struggle the most to pay for their meals tend to be more obese, rather than less.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sure, but food prices aren't the reason people are struggling to pay. Housing, medical care, transportation and education have all gone up steeply in price over that period, but food hasn't, at least to my understanding.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jackfruitstaken @AgrippaNothing
Sure, but it's not like we'd be better off if they were higher though, except the extent that poor people had to temporarily starve themselves and their families more often.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh, no, it's not that we should grow less food. It's just that capital has for almost a century been capable of producing an amount of food that is problematic to its own reproduction
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.