Twitter's CEO loves this article about driving conservatives from public life and turning the rest of the country into California in the "new civil war." Literally what it's abouthttps://twitter.com/jack/status/982096889930657792 …
-
-
You seem pretty pumped about it
-
I appreciate the honesty!
-
-
Jack replied to Peter....Peter was never seen again...
-
Peter’s last post was 42 mins ago. Your stamp is an hour ago. If your post was tongue and cheek I apologize. I would agree a lot of Conservative and/or openly pro-Israel users seem to get suspended a lot more frequently than the lefties, and banned more but Peter is still here.
-
It’s a joke. Hard to tell nowadays though.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“Great read.” But I certainly don’t and would never support this brand of thinking....said no one ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hi Jack, I am back. Can you please let your users/shareholders/advertisers know why Twitter's entire platform is propped up by misleading/inflated follower/following counts?https://twitter.com/geoffgolberg/status/979133159811047425 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great read kind of implies that
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Actually,it's obvious you're pretty much agree with the article.Your own platform shows incredible prejudice against conservatives .Banning,shadowbanning and suspending conservatives for little to no reason.Then people like this have no repercussions...pic.twitter.com/tzOmfVqIvW
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Great read” isn’t exactly lukewarm.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I swear to God, people and their freaking word games.. "i'm going to share this article and say 'Great Read' but I'm not going to have an opinion on it" GTFO of here with that. NOBODY shares an article on their timelines if they didn't agree with its content unless they stated so
-
Generally when I say “Great Read” - I assume people will see that as an endorsement because 99.99% of the time it is. If it’s something I disagree with or take no opinion on but think it’s thought provoking- that’s what I’ll explicitly say - so there’s no confusion.
-
That's pretty much it... The fact that Jack wants to be play the naive card is one of the most disingenuous things I've ever seen on this platform and that's saying something..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You said “great read.” That’s generally an endorsement of the concepts. And you can see why it would be disturbing to have the ceo of a communication platform think one side has to “lose” “at this juncture.” Every totalitarian feels that way and is also as sure they are right.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.