Do better by responding to the replies to your own tweet
-
-
-
Which ones?
-
I don't think i should have to point that out to you.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why did you make it so those blocked by the President are no longer able to respond to his tweets?
-
Because
@Twitter is going down the shithole. They let bots roam free, Trump blatantly violate their TOS, & penalize ppl following the rules -
Lemme know how long the time out was for this tweet
-
I'm verified, so they never put me in timeout. It's a caste system here
@twitter - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You completely contradict yourself in the thread. You say you treat all accounts the same but treat Trump differently bc of "newsworthiness"
-
Deleting presidential tweets puts them ABOVE the president in non-elected capacity. Very tricky. What they can do is reduce visibility.
-
He's using their private platform & violating their terms of service. They have every right to penalize him. He isn't a dictator.
-
I know. Having the right is not the issue. Twitter can't be responsible for the repercussions. A pvt company given the leash of government.
-
They not only CAN be responsible, they SHOULD be responsible. It's their platform, and Trump must play by their rules.
-
Twitter needs to update their TOS stating that anyone with enough "power" can threaten ppl & violate their rules bc they are "newsworthy"

-
Also, it's complete BS that they recently banned people who Trump has blocked from replying to him. It's like Twitter doesn't even care… smh
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Let's say some guy threatens to kill millions of people, and he has a nuclear arsenal. Does that violate twitter terms and conditions?
-
I called him a son of a Bit** today and got slapped with a 24 hour freeze on my acct. But it's ok for HIM to do it.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.