you literally tweeted that Jones didn’t violate the rules before having journalists point it out to you. again, why the soft touch?https://twitter.com/jack/status/1029800843363672064 …
-
-
You're delusional, homey Perhaps it's time to increase your food consumption beyond one meal per day Revised last sentence for you: "Our policies are intentionally vague and riddled with subjectivity. We will enforce as we see fit"
-
“As we see fit for our bank account” Fixed it :)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Do you not keep a record of deleted tweets for a period of time? I’m assuming you still check deleted tweets for abuse, otherwise someone could keep writing harassment and deleting them before twitter had reviewed them, which would be an appalling loophole...
-
My understanding was that there was a legal responsibility to keep a copy of deleted social media posts for at least some period of time. Am I wrong?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Here's an idea,
@jack: set up a notification for Infowars and Alex Jones ON YOUR PERSONAL PHONE, Screengrab every tweet, and YOU report his tweets if they are in violation of the rules. Then show us your report submission. Then maybe we will believe that you give a sh*t. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why is Trump’s tweet calling a black woman a “dog” still up on Twitter? Does that not violate Twitter’s TOS?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Jack- the problem seems less to do with Alex Jones & more w/ the perceived bias w/ which Twitter applies enforcement. For example, there is a mountain of evidence demonstrating overt racism by
@sarahjeong yet not only was there no enforcement but she got a blue check mark. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not retroactive? So if someone threatened to kill hundreds of people but deleted the tweet before your staff received and reviewed the report, that would be ok?
@jack, your rules make no sense. You need a 3rd party to rethink this because you just don’t get it - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
I think it's less of the fact that he wants infowars, and more so that he doesnt care if it's here or not. Whichever results in his own personal profit. He literally doesnt give a shit about anything else.

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Really? if you have receipts for jack *NOW* would be the time to put them out there...such as





pic.twitter.com/HcRTsU9Rto
-
@jack they violated your rules but still remain on Twitterpic.twitter.com/wQza32FyJe
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.