2/ For background, flight was from early March, 10-hour flight, thorough attempt to contact all passengers. A massive lift, so nice work by the authors on that front.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ Index patient had active symptoms, actively coughing, no masks First takeaways: -airplanes are vectors of disease, moving people around countries and globe and spreading -this person was irresponsible *stay home when sick*
Show this thread -
4/ big picture numbers: This is 1 flight from March (and I'm not totally convinced in-flight transmission happened, as you'll see in a sec) For context, TSA logged 4.7M passengers in just past 7 days If planes were hot beds of spread, we'd see more...a lot more
Show this thread -
5/ I made this point in op-ed from May: "Billions of people travel by plane every year, yet there have only been a handful of documented disease outbreaks attributable to airplanes in the past 40 years."https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/18/airplanes-dont-make-you-sick-really/ …
Show this thread -
6/ Can you get this on an airplane? Yes, sure, you can get this virus anywhere. Time on airplane is just lower risk than people think. People tend to point to the airplane first, ignoring the other travel-associated activity Now, to the report...
Show this thread -
7/ They report 15 "flight-associated" cases, and rule out that these travelers had pre- or post-flight exposure. First thing that caught my eye showing that this couldn't be correct: "median symptom onset was 8.8 days (interquartile range 5.8–13.5) after arrival" hmmm...
Show this thread -
8/ CDC reports median incubation period of 4-5 days, with 97.5% of symptoms showing within 11.5 days. A sign we should dig deeper in this airplane study...
Show this thread -
9/ And when you dig, you uncover. Things like this: "We also note that cases 3 and 14 experienced symptom onset 17 days after flight VN54." 17 days after the flight! Yet, the authors say these are 'flight-associated'. (there's more...)pic.twitter.com/m8Jg8ijeMd
Show this thread -
10/ five of the 15 "airplane-associated' cases had symptoms beyond the time when 97.5% of people have symptoms (11.5 days) Unlikely these five people caught this on flight.
Show this thread -
11/ So, the '15 cases of airplane-associated cases' is already down to 10 with just some basic review of symptom data. What else can we learn about those other 10...
Show this thread -
12/ The authors took pains to explain away post-flight transmission: "We consider local transmission after arrival in Vietnam unlikely." But when you peek at the appendix, you find more info that suggests post-flight exposure occurred...
Show this thread -
11/ in addition to the symptom data supporting that post-flight exposure happened, so does the time-activity info There sure seems like *a lot* of important post-flight exposure activity Like this: 3 of the 'flight-associated' cases went on *CRUISE SHIPS* after flight (blue)pic.twitter.com/AehOIDHKf3
Show this thread -
12/ Really, look at that figure hard Combine it with the earlier statement that median incubation was 8.8 days after flight, as opposed to 4-5 days from CDC Walk back 4-5 days from when their symptoms appeared. --> cruise ships and hotels is what you see
Show this thread -
13/ For example: Case 2 Symptom onset March 10 activity 5 days before? cruise ship (same with Case 3)
Show this thread -
14/ It is certainly possible some got this on the airplane - the index patient person was actively shedding and coughing + no masks. And strongest evidence here that there might have been transmission on airplane is several cases adjacent to business class.
Show this thread -
15/ if you take out those people who had symptoms well beyond incubation period (meaning, they were unlikely to have gotten this from the flight), does Figure 1 that shows the dense clustering (the strongest argument the authors make), look different?
Show this thread -
15/ eg, Case #4, 10, and 11 are only ones w/ symptoms within 6 days of flight. Does Figure 1 look different if it only shows these 3 cases as 'airplane-associated' cases?
Show this thread -
15/ One way to explore this more is look more closely at the time-activity data and symptom onset in relation to seat location on airplane, but I don't see a way to link the data from the seating chart (fig 1) to time-activity data in appendix)
Show this thread -
-
17/ Taking a step back You can get this virus anywhere. There been millions of travelers since this flight yet one report (similar to SARS). Could be more, sure, but overall rare. And this report is not as airtight as the headline and abstract (and news reports) make it seem
Show this thread -
18/ Big picture: I stand by statement I made in op-ed in May. -time on airplane is lower risk than other parts of travel -masking on airplanes right now is a must -take precautions -only travel if really necessary -STAY HOME WHEN SICKhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/18/airplanes-dont-make-you-sick-really/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.