... to ensure that they are doing all they can to help the people that are being exploited by that system. 2/2
-
-
Replying to @j_d_richards @Theonetruekek and
Why should they? What do they owe small creators? The answer is nothing. It's their platform and people should be either hosting their own videos (hint this is expensive) or stop complaining. YouTube deserves a lot of criticism, but their copyright system is based on (1)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @v1becentral @j_d_richards and
Extremely vague laws, which makes writing good software hard. They did an okay job, only a small amount of people (compared to their user-base) gets false flagged. Do you realize what a technical marvel YouTube is. Hosting videos for free is an amazing feat of our time. (2)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @v1becentral @j_d_richards and
And small creators are using YouTube, not the other way around. Of course there are mutual benefits, but obviously they are and should focus on helping bigger creators. It's only fair (3)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @v1becentral @Theonetruekek and
they owe it to people who, with youtube’s actual help, can hope to generate profit for themselves and for youtube. and the right to fair use is not a vague law at all... it means people can use content made by others as long as they adapt it enough to make it their own. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_d_richards @v1becentral and
without this, decent reviews that use evidence from the pieces of content being reviewed couldn’t exist. it’s youtube’s responsibility to ensure that the people who use their platform aren’t being exploited by the software that youtube has developed. 2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_d_richards @v1becentral and
3/3 (lol) my issue is not that the system is still developing. my issue is that youtube has no facility to help those who are being affected by oversights or flaws in systems that are out of their control. i’m thinking that this comes to down to perspectives for us though
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_d_richards @Theonetruekek and
It kinda does, but you also don't seem to understand the sheer amount of content being uploaded to YouTube, I don't either since it's so large both of us can't fathom it. They are trying to put a scaleable solution in to place.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @v1becentral @Theonetruekek and
i do understand how vast youtube is, but i also understand that not every single video to get uploaded is affected by a copyright strike. my issue also isn’t that every issue can’t be dealt with. it’s that there seems to be no attempt to help smaller accounts
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @j_d_richards @Theonetruekek and
And my issue with that statement, that from a business perspective: what good does it do YouTube? I already told you that, we're going in circles here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
what it would do is motivate smaller youtubers to keep trying to produce videos bc they actually feel valued and appreciated by the platform. then, they may one day become successful and make money, not only for themselves but for youtube. that’s what good it does for youtube.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.