Choose how many frames you want and prepare them. We are going to use N=5 frames (2/5)pic.twitter.com/S7iyRvGwkX
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Choose how many frames you want and prepare them. We are going to use N=5 frames (2/5)pic.twitter.com/S7iyRvGwkX
Create mask made of transparent slits of width 1 (pixel) interleaved by opaque bars of width N (=number of frames) (3/5)pic.twitter.com/7kEBEnzO50
Cut your first frame by leaving only what is visible when the mask is over it. Cut the second frame leaving only what is visible when the mask (shifted by 1) is over it, and so on. (4/5)pic.twitter.com/FnIngqWhin
Sum all of your frames (they have no overlap by construction). Now you have the image you need to give the illusion of movement. Just slide the mask over it at constant speed! (5/5)pic.twitter.com/MWRb5wdbLd
p.s. I am sure this technique has a name, but I don't know it. Anyone can help?
Released in the #publicdomain and uploaded on @WikiCommons together with the @WolframResearch Mathematica script used to generate it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kinegram.gif …
Reminds me almost of a two slit experiment, but I think I am totally wrong!;-)
No interference, so it's much simpler than the N-slit experiment 
There is some wave pattern visible inside uniform moving grid pattern. What could be the reason? A non-integer factor based mismatch between monitor pixel size and gif image pixel size? (or some random up/down scaling of images while converting into .gif?)
Just a bit of aliasing due to the image rescaling.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.