But it was the only alternative to proprietary software for ~20 years. So lots of folks worked on it despite finding Stallman problematic.
-
-
Replying to @sarahmei
This was the period when women largely declined to be part of computing, despite having pretty reasonable representation through the 80s.
1 reply 8 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
The main faces of software at this point: - terminally-uncool Bill Gates - the dude who keeps saying women aren't interesting colleagues
1 reply 6 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
The "pipeline," as it were, dried up from the middle outwards, as Stallman's attitude normalized those prejudices & attracted more like him.
2 replies 7 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
In the early 2000s, "open source" was a breath of fresh air. All of the usefulness! None of the built-in arrogance, privilege, or misogyny!
5 replies 3 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
But just because it wasn't built in doesn't mean it disappeared. As folks converted, the behaviors normalized by Stallman & others followed.
1 reply 1 retweet 33 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
We've spent the better part of another 20 years shaking that shit off. And we're not done with that process, by any means.
3 replies 5 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
Our drive now for diversity/inclusion wasn't even conceivable until we discarded GNU, Stallman, & "free software" in favor of "open source."
2 replies 17 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
It's not an accident that the communities who still, today, embrace that outdated philosophy are the least diverse and the most hostile.
5 replies 11 retweets 52 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
dudes in my mentions who think criticizing Stallman's attitude towards women is an ad hominem attack
2 replies 2 retweets 80 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.









