is this a dynamic type stan acct
python: explicit is better than implicit 
simple is better than complex 
this is the zen of python 
scala: hahahaha explicits lmao wanna hear something explicit how about go FUCK yourself
-
-
-
nah i am on the static typing train but also i just want to know where all these imports and traits or whatever even Come from
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Python: simple is better than complex Scala: let's give developers a limited implementation of Prolog at compile-time and see how it goes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've always read the zen of python as somewhat ironic. Item #2 proclaims that "Explicit is better than implicit" in a language that keeps the types implicit.
-
Use mypy. Problem solved
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I still don't understand how Python is explicit with no strong typing and invisible characters (indentation) for code blocks. Can someone enlighten me?
-
Yeah, I'm a Python fanboy but I've always found that one weird as well. Python is not exactly very verbose or explicit imo. Since 3.6 it has the syntax for static typing, but it doesn't actually check anything (you have to do that in your IDE or use something like mypy).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
feeling seen
-
erik what are traits.......what are implicits
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This reminds me of descriptors in Python: "For objects, the machinery is in object.__getattribute__() which transforms b.x into type(b).__dict__['x'].__get__(b, type(b))." I'd say this neither explicit nor simple.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.