ok here is an ML product i actually want: service that combs thru a paper’s citations and tells you which ones build upon the work, which ones disagree, which ones advance the state of the art, etc
Show this thread
-
v tiring reading cs papers and then finding out the methods proposed are now 6 (!!) months out of date and the whole field has moved on humanities/social science papers are usually grounded in the author’s own stances and finding opposing criticism is often surprisingly hard
Show this thread
at some level i think i am proposing replacing the ppl that write those books that are just enormous lit reviews and also those editors that curate the essays in the backs of critical editions of classics, apologies
