ok here is an ML product i actually want: service that combs thru a paper’s citations and tells you which ones build upon the work, which ones disagree, which ones advance the state of the art, etc
Show this thread
v tiring reading cs papers and then finding out the methods proposed are now 6 (!!) months out of date and the whole field has moved on humanities/social science papers are usually grounded in the author’s own stances and finding opposing criticism is often surprisingly hard
-
-
at some level i think i am proposing replacing the ppl that write those books that are just enormous lit reviews and also those editors that curate the essays in the backs of critical editions of classics, apologies
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Legal databases already do this for case citations (positive treatment, negative) and will normally indicate somewhere if it’s been overturned. But - not AI based (afaik)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.