this is........not a good take responding to a reductive statement with an even more reductive statement accomplishes nothing and it’s disconcerting to see this coming from ppl you look up tohttps://twitter.com/patio11/status/1070874040619819009 …
i think “scandals happen anyways” and “non engineers also suck” are both flimsy arguments, and i don’t agree w/ the default tendency of tech ppl to judge the impact of complex social systems like education by simple quantifiables like scandals prevented or dollars earned
-
-
1. at baseline, other eng professions have ethics reqs for a reason. eng is a field where the external impact created per individual worker is big + lasting, and that not being ingrained in the tech mindset is part of why all the software around us is such garbage
-
2. broader point but why are ppl so against humanities/stem cross-reqs!! taking classes where you’re forced to think differently & work w/ppl who think differently and care about diff things makes you a) better at whatever you do and b) less of a sociopath
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.