When you’re inclusive but still hate the poor.
408
24.7K
95.5K
Conversation
The space reached out to me with some more information about the bench.
44
395
4,493
Here are a few more (less ironic) examples of the same sort of exclusionary design from around my neighbourhood. Most of these are deliberate choices by the city.
Replying to
Ultimately we need to house the homeless. In the meantime, help!
Taking the bench away won’t make things better. The space is also in need of more benches. The people who run it take donations at springboardperformance.com/containr/.
1
23
203
So they're supposed to make benches without arms or hand-grips for elderly people or others with balance/mobility issues? Although I don't think the bench in 3rd photo helps anything (the "arms" are too low if you need them for stability), but arms/rails aren't always "hostile".
1
1
22
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
If you really want to delve into exclusionary design you should look into the development of the parkway system in nyc. Only the super wealthy had cars back then
1
3
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
Another exclusionary feature is making the edges of raised planters, etc, at a steep angle (rather than flat) to discourage people from sitting on them.
The entrance to GGP at Haight/Stanyan is a great example.
1
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Did you know shelters have capacities and requirements? In addition to that if the shelter is full then you sir are out of luck. Where should they sleep? Can’t sleep on the benches, can’t sleep on the sand, I guess they have to go to sidewalks. Or are we going to put spikes up
4