“There is an essential read by Steve Sailer at Taki’s Magazine from a week ago which might well explain the cultural and political landscape better than anything else you’ve seen in recent vintage.”https://spectator.org/a-most-expected-backlash/ …
-
-
itd stem the tide of immigration but why that's desirable as such is a mystery to me. if capital finds cheap labor overseas itll go to it, and when US bombs come with it itll provoke further attacks on the US
-
It's a mystery to you because you have a limited worldview
-
ok mr. cosmopolitan lay it on me
-
Flow of goods does not necessitate flow of migration. Japan is a good example of this.
-
Japan was a stagflation economy after being propped up by the UN and has seen economic growth in conjunction with increased immigration
-
You see reduced GDP growth as a bad thing, I do not. Reduction in population, slowed economic growth is more easily sustained in the long term
-
yes, the lack of GDP growth occurred in Japan during times of more homogeneity than now, and growth has further been spurred by liberalization of trade. They have not yielded successful growth from lack of immigration. There's no causal relationship there.
-
I never suggested there was a casual relationship, I said flow of goods does not necessitate migration. I would rather Japan experience a slow reduction in population, reduced economic growth, and remain wholly Japanese. This is also more ecologically sound.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.