This case arises from an EU complaint that Korea had failed to abide by commitments to make "continued and sustained efforts" towards ratification of core ILO conventions. This is the exact same language included in the EU-China CAI investment deal agreement in principle.
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Full ruling from the Panel of Experts: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2021/january/tradoc_159358.pdf …
Näytä tämä ketju -
The European Commission attempts to sell this as a victory, but has ignored the key ruling confirming that the only obligation on Korea is to make efforts towards ratification, and cannot be held to account for ratification not yet having taken place.https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=2238 …
Näytä tämä ketju -
In summary, under the current wording of the EU-China
#CAI investment deal:
is not in breach of the agreement if it fails to ratify ILO conventions, including on forced labour
cannot attempt to hold China to account for failing to meet key milestones towards ratificationNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
It's meaningless to have an agreement if people are not going to keep promises And CCP has a really bad record on keeping promisespic.twitter.com/AlcDPHVAJN
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I mean it's crystal clear the
#CAI is a non-commitment towards ILO conventionsKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
Korea is not in breach of FTA by failing to ratify ILO conventions